Aristotle in his theory
of slavery defines slavery and justified its importance for everyone master,
state, economic system and even to slave itself. He beliefs that slavery is a
natural institution. Slaves by nature are dependent, not virtuous, less capable
in the development of the state but they are physically strong which makes them
a great helper. This belief can be traced back to Plato's theory of soul, which
beliefs in natural disabilities and differences exist in the human soul.
According to Aristotle, slaves are naturally inferior and masters are naturally superior. Just like the soul rules the body similarly reason rules the appetite. Master has reason therefore slaves depend on it. Slaves provide leisure to master, leisure is necessary for the welfare state. In its essence, it promotes the proportionate distribution of honour and resources. Aristotle is conservative in nature. He believed it as a profitable institution that has sustained the test of time and has reduced chaos and disorder in society. In a state of stability, a nation can grow economically and prosper.
It is good for masters because the master is the citizen of the state which means he has reason and property and is concerned with the issues of the nation and community, slaves can provide assistance in daily works which required physical strength. Slaves in the presence of masters can share virtues and grow rationality, knowledge and capacity. Even liberate if reason and capacity developed.
Aristotle in his categorization defies legal slavery. Prisoners of war are forced slaves who are defeated in a war which does not justify the low rationality. Slavery was essential for all-around development but the master has no right to misuse his power. Slaves are only assistance but not subordinate. But thinkers like Barker says, "justification for the necessity of slavery rather than deduction". In the age of human rights, his words are criticized by comparing on capacity.
No comments:
Post a Comment